GSIG LLC Rotating Header Image

“innovation fund”

Home Ownership > Renting (If you can get a loan)

300px Cshpi peak.svg Home Ownership > Renting (If you can get a loan)

Image via Wikipedia

According to a report this week from a TD Bank affiliate, South Florida’s ratio of rents to home prices is its highest since 1997.

According to Alistair Bentley of TD Economics, during the recession, home prices in Palm Beach, Broward and Miami-Dade counties dropped by roughly 50%, while rents declined by just 2.5% over the same period. He cites data from the Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller Home Price Index and the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Bentley says that with homes so affordable now, owning is better than renting.  “Of course, that’s if you can get a loan.”

According to TD, the region’s rental market soared by 40,000 households from 2006 to 2009, mainly due to the big change to the onslaught of foreclosures following the housing boom.

Bentley states that because of strong demand, rents gradually are increasing, but the pendulum eventually will swing back to homeownership as rents become less affordable.

Bentley concludes that ultimately, South Florida needs homeowners to lift the region out of its housing slump. He predicts a complete recovery “is a couple years off.”


 Home Ownership > Renting (If you can get a loan)

DISCOVER THE NEW WORLD OF HUD

809 DISCOVER THE NEW WORLD OF HUD

ARE YOU A FIRST TIME HOMEBUYER?

If yes, this class is for you!


DISCOVER THE NEW WORLD OF HUD

U.S Department of Housing

and Urban Development (HUD)

**LARGEST REAL ESTATE MARKET IN THE USA **

NEW RULES / NEW SYSTEM

DISCOVER NEW BUSINESSES AND RESOURCES

GSIG LLC

HUD LISTING BROKERS

INVITE YOU TO PARTICIPATE

ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE NEW RULES & SYSTEM TO WORK WITH HUD PROPERTIES

ALL THE QUESTIONS – ALL THE ANSWERS

In this dynamic, FREE, interactive training,

you will learn how to:

  • Complete the HUD docs for a correct contract package!
  • Submit e-bids and monitor the process from start to closing!
  • Earn substantial commissions and repeat business!
  • What HUD means for a First Time Home Buyer
  • Meet our top HUD agents!

Seating is Limited.

Reserve Now!

Wednesday, June 22nd @ 5:00 PM

T0 RSVP

email hudteam@gsigreo.com

or call 561.245.8843 x 3

THE EVENT WILL BE HELD AT

OUR OFFICE

7251 W. Palmetto Park Road, Suite 206

Boca Raton, Florida

*Refreshments Will Be Served*

 DISCOVER THE NEW WORLD OF HUD

Shadow Inventory Hurts Housing Rebound

300px I 195 Miami eastbound Shadow Inventory Hurts Housing Rebound

Image via Wikipedia

According to an analysis by Standard & Poor’s, it will take an average of 49 months to clear the nation’s supply of homes that are in some stage of foreclosure.

The 49-months forecast is up 40% from a year ago. These properties are referred to as “shadow inventory” because they ultimately will go on the market even though they’re not currently listed for sale. This shadow inventory is seen as one of the larger obstacles to a rebound in home values because lenders are likely to re-sell these properties at deep discounts.

In the Miami metro area, which has $57.8 billion worth of shadow inventory, S&P estimates it will take 60 months — five years — to work through these distressed homes. On the bright side, the 60 months is unchanged from the third quarter of 2010 and a year ago.

Miami is the only one of the top 20 metro areas surveyed that didn’t see an increase compared with the third quarter and a year ago.

 Shadow Inventory Hurts Housing Rebound

Nation’s Largest Banks Hold Over 20 Billion in Foreclosures EACH

4047601378 878a0d7dd3 m Nations Largest Banks Hold Over 20 Billion in Foreclosures EACH
Image by SEIU International via Flickr

According to new data released this week, the nation’s largest banks are holding enormous volumes of distressed home loans. Not only has the housing crisis left major lenders knee-deep in an ocean of non-performers, but added exposure to early delinquencies means they could sink even deeper.

According to an analysis by Weiss Ratings, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo each reported more than $20 billion in single-family mortgages currently foreclosed or in the process of foreclosure as of midyear. In addition, Weiss found that for each dollar these banks held of mortgages in foreclosure, there were an additional $2 in loans in the pipeline that were 30 days or more past due.

Among all U.S. banks, JPMorgan Chase has the largest volume of mortgages in foreclosure or foreclosed with $21.7 billion. On top of that, the company has $43.4 billion more in mortgages past due.

Compared to JPMorgan, Bank of America has a somewhat smaller volume of foreclosures — $20.3 billion — but it has a larger pipeline of past-due mortgages at $54.6 billion.

Wells Fargo’s foreclosures come to $20.5 billion, with $48 billion in overdue home loans.

According to Weiss, including all foreclosed and delinquent categories, Bank of America has the largest volume of bad mortgages among U.S. banks, with $74.9 billion, while Wells Fargo has the second largest with $68.6 billion.

Other banks, despite their large size, are less heavily exposed to mortgage difficulties. Citibank has $6.3 billion in foreclosures and $19.2 billion in past-due mortgages, or a total of $25.6 billion.

The volume of foreclosures and delinquencies held by other large banks, such as U.S. Bank ($9.5 billion), PNC Bank ($8.9 billion), and SunTrust ($7.3 billion) is even smaller.

Martin D. Weiss, chairman of Weiss Ratings, states: “In addition to the volume of bad mortgages, the vulnerability of each bank to the foreclosure crisis depends on the capital and loan loss reserves it has set aside to cover losses and other factors such as its earnings, liquidity, reliance on less-stable deposits, and the quality of its overall loan portfolio.”

Among banks with $1 billion or more of mortgages already foreclosed or in process of foreclosure, Weiss found that Wells Fargo has the greatest exposure to bad mortgages in proportion to its capital. For each dollar of Tier 1 Capital, the bank has 75.4 cents in bad mortgages, or a ratio of 75.4%.

The equivalent ratios for JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and SunTrust are 66.8%, 66%, and 57.6%, respectively.

Weiss explained that losses on foreclosures and past-due loans will first be absorbed by the banks’ loan loss reserves, but then they may have to dip into capital. He states: “Considering that many large banks also take other kinds of risks beyond strictly home mortgages. These are very large exposures that could directly impact shareholders and even the safety of depositors.”

Reflecting both their exposure to foreclosures and the other economic factors, the JPMorgan, BofA, and Wells all merit a rating of D (“weak”) or lower from Weiss Ratings, indicating vulnerability to financial difficulties and instability if conditions continue to deteriorate.

 Nations Largest Banks Hold Over 20 Billion in Foreclosures EACH

July Sales Down 12.4% From Last Month

300px US DeptOfCommerce Seal.svg July Sales Down 12.4% From Last Month
Image via Wikipedia

Sales of new homes unexpectedly sank 12.4% in July from the prior month, showing continued weakness in the housing market absent government stimulus.

Yesterday, the Commerce Department said that sales of new, single-family houses in July were sold at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 276,000 units. That is 32.4% below the July 2009 estimate.

The government report claims that sales of previously owned homes dove in July, falling 27.2% over the prior month and igniting fresh concerns over the economic recovery.

The new-home sales numbers — registered when a consumer signs a purchase contract on a home, as opposed to existing sales numbers that are measured when a deal closes escrow — give the most current snapshot of buyer interest in the market absent the popular $8,000 federal tax credit for shoppers.

Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected some modest improvement after new-home sales plunged in May and then bounced back in June.

Dan Greenhaus, chief economic strategist for New York brokerage Miller Tabak + Co., wrote in a research note:

“The fallout from the first-time home-buyers credit continues, but in a perverse way, this is a good thing. Investors are getting their first ‘organic’ look at the housing market in nearly one year.”

The median sales price of new houses sold in July 2010 was $204,000 while the seasonally adjusted estimate of new-home inventory at the end of July was 210,000, representing a supply of 9.1 months worth of supply at the current pace.

This Month in Real Estate (US) : August 2010

YouTube, Yahoo, MySpace, Metacafe, DailyMotion, Blip.tv, Facebook and Flickr

Vote NO on Amendment 4

vote no on 4 Vote NO on Amendment 4As high unemployment continues to plague the state of Florida, working families and small business owners have been disproportionately affected. In the midst of such vulnerable economic times, the last thing Florida needs is an amendment that would raise taxes, kill jobs, and promote endless litigation at the taxpayer’s expense.

However, that is exactly what Amendment 4 would do.  This “Vote on Everything” amendment would force taxpayers to fund expensive referenda for every technical change to their local comprehensive plan.

Its proponents claim that this initiative simply empowers Floridians to make decisions on land use issues, however, Amendment 4 is far from simple. A local version of Amendment 4 was implemented in the small town of St. Pete Beach in 2006. Since then, the city has experienced chaos and confusion regarding a new growth management process that has made smarter, well-coordinated growth impossible.

The St. Petersburg Times says that the measure has been “divisive, expensive, and an impediment to much needed growth.”  Worse still, taxpayers in St. Pete Beach have been burdened with over a half-a-million dollars in legal fees that decimated the city budget. When voters approved four pro-growth amendments in the hopes of improving economic conditions, Amendment 4 lawyers sued to overturn the will of the people.

If taken statewide, Amendment 4 would make St. Pete Beach look mild by comparison. Under this measure, it would not be uncommon for voters to face 200 to 300 minor plan revisions each year. The enormous cost of these taxpayer funded elections, coupled with expensive litigation, will result in higher taxes for all Floridians.
Furthermore, a recent study by Tony Villamil of the Washington Economic Group, indicates that Amendment 4 would result in $4 billion of lost state and local tax revenue due to forgone economic development projects.
The facts indicate that Amendment 4 would result in higher taxes and fewer jobs in a time when our economy is most vulnerable.  Simply put, Florida cannot afford Amendment 4.  Vote no on Amendment 4. 


Get more information @ http://florida2010.org/

Florida Gets 418 Million for Distressed Homeowners

foreclosure Florida Gets 418 Million for Distressed Homeowners
This past Friday, Florida was awarded $418 million of federal stimulus spending to help unemployed homeowners who owe more on their mortgages than their homes are actually worth. Florida homeowners are eagerly awaiting details of this program, which was announced by President Obama last month. The awards come from a $1.5-billion Innovation Fund for the Hardest Hit Housing Markets.

Florida will get $418 million.
 
Treasury officials released guidelines telling state agencies how this stimulus might be distributed:

  • Modifying mortgages or giving lenders an incentive to forgive a portion of loans to make payments affordable.
  • Paying down part of a mortgage to make it possible to modify the rest of it.
  • Making it easier to complete “short sales,” in which homes are sold for less than the mortgage.
  • Allowing owners to give up their deeds to avoid foreclosure.
  • Aiding unemployed borrowers to help them avoid foreclosure.
  • Giving incentives to lenders to reduce or modify second liens on mortgages.
  • The program must be limited to those who owe no more than $729,750. State agencies may choose to target low- and moderate-income borrowers.
  • More specific information will come from the Florida Housing Finance Corp., a state-funded agency, which promises to provide updates for consumers on its website: FloridaHousing.org.

Obama Pledges 1.5 Billion for Upside-Down Homeowners

GSIG LLC

This past Friday, the White House announced a new initiative to help the nation’s hardest hit housing markets. President Obama has allocated 1.5 billion dollars in aid for states where home prices fell more than 20% after the aftermath of the housing bubble and unemployment is high.

Since the Obama Administration’s economic policies began to take effect almost a year ago, home prices across the country are beginning to stabilize. However, local conditions vary considerably, and the administration says price declines, together with the effects of high unemployment, means that many homeowners are still facing serious challenges.

President Obama is setting up an “innovation fund” for state housing agencies to develop assistance programs for upside-down, unemployed homeowners. Based on home price declines and unemployment rates, a formula will be created for allocating funding among eligible states. According to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the money will go to support homeowners in California, Nevada, Arizona, Florida, and Michigan.

The Treasury must approve each Housing Finance Agency’s (HFA) program design, which will include programs that address the challenges of second liens and assistance for the unemployed and borrowers who owe more than their home is worth.
The White House said in a statement: “The funds must be used to pay for mortgage modifications or for other permitted uses under federal guidelines.”

Unemployment has hit many home-owners since the recession began two years ago. Those in states where prices have dropped more than 20% often find themselves owing more than the house is worth. In such circumstances, one use of funds would be for HFAs to begin programs to help unemployed homeowners until they have secured a new job.

For states where home prices have crashed, a large percentage of homeowners are finding themselves upside-down on their mortgage. A sale is often difficult to secure because lenders may not agree to a transaction that fails to pay back the mortgage in full. The White House said HFAs should experiment with programs that will help borrowers negotiate with lenders.

State HFAs will determine the priorities facing their local markets. The administration said agencies’ plans will be under strict transparency and accountability rules, with all funded program designs and success measurements posted online.

The Treasury is expected to announce maximum state level allocations in the next two weeks, along with rules governing the submission of program designs by HFAs.

Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Technorati button Reddit button Myspace button Linkedin button Delicious button Digg button Stumbleupon button Newsvine button Youtube button
SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline